Производство говядины в специализированном мясном скотоводстве США

1. Опыт разведения мясного скота в штате Виргиния (США): Молочное и мясное скотоводство / Е. Н. Усманова, Л. И. Кузякина. – 2017. – № 7. – С. 18-21.

2. Приступа В. Н., Колосов Ю. А. Мониторинг селекционного процесса и разработка селекционной программы в животноводстве: монография / Приступа В. Н., Колосов Ю. А. – пос. Персиановский: Изд-во Донского ГАУ, 2008. – 178 с.

1. Усманова Е. Н. Реализация скота мясных пород по американскому методу / Е. Н. Усманова // Зоотехния. – 2018. – № 12. – С. 18-22.

4. Харламов А. В. Н аучно-практическое обоснование новых подходов к повышению эффективности использования корма и производства говядины в мясном и молочном скотоводстве: автореферат дис. ... доктора сельскохозяйственных наук: 06.02.08, 06.02.10 / Харламов Анатолий Васильевич; Всерос. науч.-исслед. ин-т мясного скотоводства. – Оренбург, 2010. – 49 с.

1. Adams D. C., Clark R. T., Coady S. A., Lamb J. B., Nielsen M. K. Extended grazing systems for improving economic returns from Nebraska sandhills cow/calf operations // Range Manage. – 1994. – Vol. 47. – P. 258-263.

2. American West – The Cattle Industry. [Электронный ресурс]: History on the Net America. Salem Media : [сайт]. Р ежим доступа: https://www.historyonthenet.com/american-west-the-cattle-industry (дата обращения: 27.07.2019).

3. Archer A. and other. The Kansas Beef Cattle Industry /A. Archer, T. Bowser, J. Collett, L. Montes, A. Tran // Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 2010. – 46 p.

4. Breed comparisons in the Germplasm Evaluation Program at MARC / L. V. Cundiff, F. Szabo, K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, J. D. Crouse // Proc. Beef Improv. Fed. Ann. Res. Sym. and Ann. Mtg. – 1993. – P. 124-136.

5. Bull selection and management gulde. / Brett Barham Dan W. Moser / / University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture, County Governments Cooperating. – 2011. – 39 p.

6. Cundiff L. V., Szabo F., Gregory K. E., Koch R. M., Dikeman M. E., Crouse J. D. Breed comparisons in the Germplasm Evaluation Program at

MARC. Proc. Beef Improv. Fed. Ann. Res. Sym. and Ann. Mtg. – 1993. P. 124136.

1. Daniels W. L., Zipper C. E. Powell River Project / W. L. Daniels, C. E. Zipper // Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Режим доступа: www.cses.vt.edu/PRP/ www.ext.vt.edu, publication 460-121 (дата обращения: 18. 02.2016).

2. Gonzalez J. M, Phelps K. J. United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys – A review. / J. M. Gonzalez, K. J. Phelps // Animal Science. – 2018. – P. 1036-1042.

3. Greaser G. L. and other. Agricultural Alternatives: Enterprise Budget Analysis / J. K. Greaser, G. L. Harper. // Pennsylvania State Cooperative Extension. – 1994. – 4 p.

4. Green Urea For Future Sustainability. Cattle Market Reports 2019 // National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2019. – P. 12011209.

15. Greiner S. P. U nderstanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs). // Publications and educational recourses / S. P. Greiner. Р ежим доступа: https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/400/400-804/400-804.html (дата обращения: 20. 02.2017). – 2009.

1. Griner S. Differences in beef cattle breeds: preliminary results from the American meat animal research center // Extension Animal Scientist, Beef, VA Tech) . – 2002. Режим доступа: https://www.sites.ext.vt.edu/ newsletter-archive/livestock/aps-02_09/aps-134.html (дата обращения: 18. 02.2016).

2. Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs. Beef Improvement Federation / Editor W. D. Hohenboken // Beef Improvement Federation, Animal & Dairy Science Department, The University of Georgia, Athens. Режим доступа: www.beefimprovement.org (дата обращения: 20.07.2019). – 2009.

3. Farm Subsidy Primer / EVG’s farm subsidy database. Режим доступа: https://farm.ewg.org/subsidyprimer.php (дата обращения: 18.08.2016).

4. Rumph J. M. Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) Pfizer Animal Genetics / J. M. Rumph // Beef Sire Selection Manual Second Edition. National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium. – 2010. – P. 27-34.

1. Jones E. J. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Extension Program Jones E. J. // Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, U.S. /Department of Agriculture cooperating, Virginia Tech, 2009. Режим доступа: https://ext.vt.edu/agriculture/beefcattle.html (дата обращения: 18. 02.2016).

2. Kansas beef industry economics / Kansas Livestock Association's. Режим доступа: https://www.kla.org/resources/industry-economics (дата обращения: 27. 06.2018).

3. Landblom D. G. and other. Effects of weaning date and retained ownership on cattle performance and forage disappearance in spring calving beef systems / D. G. Landblom, S. Paisley, P. Johnson, R. Gates, S. W. Fausti, H. H. Patterson // Animal Science. – 2006. Vol. 57. – P. 139-142.

4. Mainville D., Groover G., Webb B., Waddle A. Characterization of Direct-Marketed Beef Production in Virginia / D. Mainville, G. Groover, B. Webb, A. Waddle // Agricultural and Applied Economics. Virginia Tech, 2009. – 8 p.

5. McCabe E. D. and other. Trends in Beef Calf Lots by Single Breed Sire Groups Marketed via Video Auction from 2010 Through July 14, 2017 / E. D. McCabe, M. E. King, K. E. Fike, K. L. Hill, G. M. Rogers, K. G. Odde // Animal Science. – 2018. – P. 67-68.

25. Nierenberg D. Happier Meals: Rethinking the Global Meat Industry / D. Nierenberg / / Global Meat Industry World. The New York Times. – 2005. – 6 p.

26. Over view of the United States Cattle Industry . Beef Market Reports 2019 / National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Режим доступа: https://www.nass.usda.gov (дата обращения: 20. 07.2019).

27. Pollan M. This Steer's Life. / M. Pollan / / Global Meat Industry. World. The New York Times. – 2002. – 12 p.

1. Pruitt D. and other. Effect of calving time and weaning time on cow and calf performance a preliminary report. / R. Haigh, W. Epperson, S. Fausti, D. Young. //South Dakota State University. Beef Report. – 2003. P. 49-53.

2. Rumph J. M. Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) / J. M. Rumph // Beef sire selection manual. National Beef Cattle Evaluation. Режим доступа: www.nbcec.org/producers/sire. – 2002. – P. 27-34.

3. Strategic market planning for value-added natural beef products: